The first detailed description of wide ranging peritoneal endometriosis was put forward by Daniel Shroen in 1690. 

Despite the many symptoms, it is striking over the years that recurrent practitioners recognised the wide ranging extent of the problem and the capacity for endometriosis to have a significant effect on the general well being of the affected individual. It has been described in 1776 "..in its worst stages, this disease affects the well-being of the female patient totally and adversely, her whole spirit is broken, and yet she lives in fear of still more symptoms such as further pain, the loss of consciousness and convulsions." 

The significant pain, resembling labour, associated with the disease has long been noted and at its worst was described by various 18^th century investigators as "overwhelming",  "oppressive", "convulsive", "atrocious" and "tortuous". 

Countering the thought that the problem was simply "hysteria" (the derivation incidentally coming  "from the womb"), in 1776 it was asserted that "hysteria is not an idiosyncrasy that we can attribute to the female portion of the population, it is obviously a major symptom of this deeply rooted disease." In 1797 another physician questioned who would not be nervous and hysterical , "...what with the sad state and anguish of this disease. Women are tortured by the pain associated with this disorder, followed thereafter by a struggle with all of its other myriad symptoms." 

Reading through these descriptions, and with the knowledge that perhaps 10 to 15% of the population have endometriosis, it seems almost unbelievable that in the year 2000 the disease still remains so poorly described and understood.